The writer of this essay claims to be a libertarian, but it strains credulity to believe he's truly as naive as this would seem to indicate:
I think Gay Inc. and Anti-Gay Inc....need each other badly, because whether they will admit it or not, both are working toward a common goal --- the continued stigmatization of a minority for political ends.
Both sides need this stigma, and both sides want being gay to matter, but for different political purposes.
Without the stigma, who on earth would care about gay identity politics?
Does he really believe that "AntiGay Inc." would have ever come into being had it not been for "Gay Inc."? Is he totally oblivious to the alinskyite lust for destruction that underlies the whole "gay" agenda? One is tempted to believe he's a pretender.
I think Gay Inc. and Anti-Gay Inc....need each other badly, because whether they will admit it or not, both are working toward a common goal --- the continued stigmatization of a minority for political ends.
Both sides need this stigma, and both sides want being gay to matter, but for different political purposes.
Without the stigma, who on earth would care about gay identity politics?
Does he really believe that "AntiGay Inc." would have ever come into being had it not been for "Gay Inc."? Is he totally oblivious to the alinskyite lust for destruction that underlies the whole "gay" agenda? One is tempted to believe he's a pretender.
