"Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing meat to the tiger, the tiger will turn vegetarian."  (Heywood Broun)

The Logical Outcome

Critics of same-sex "marriage" have long pointed out that if you redefine marriage to include 2 men or 2 women, that serves as a precedent for arguing that polygamy, incest, pedophilia, and bestiality should also be recognised as valid forms of "love."  How accurate their predictions were!

Speakers addressed the around 50 individuals in attendance on themes ranging from the notion that pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society to the idea that “children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult. Also discussed were arguments that an adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative” and that the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) ignores the fact that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adult heterosexuals and homosexuals have romantic feelings for one another.  (Read more here.)

Ought 2 B Memorized K-12

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Deja Vu

"A county grand jury is weighing whether to indict Wilson in Brown's shooting."  Cumpean and Ramos all over again.

Diagramming Might Do Wonders

"not only do using organic principles improve the quantity, it also improves..."  Can you belEEEEVE that verb "do"????  The idiot who penned this sentence mistook "principles" as the subject, when in fact "using" is the subject.  I just can not get over the utter stupidity (or the fact that there's no qualified editor red-inking the ridiculous mistakes).

The Ultimate Irony!

Medinat Weimar.

Surely None Dare Call It Reason!

From an outstanding article first published in The Salisbury Review (so much of this could apply to the U.S. as well):

By exploiting the enormous tolerance traditional in this country [England], the race lobby has so managed to induce and maintain feelings of guilt in the well disposed majority, that decent people are not only afraid of voicing certain thoughts, they are uncertain even of their right to think those thoughts. They are intimidated not only by their fear of giving offence by voicing their own reasonable concerns about the inner cities, but by the necessity of conducting the debate in a language which is dishonest. 
     

The term 'racism', for instance, functions not as a word with which to create insight, but as a slogan designed to suppress constructive thought. It conflates prejudice and discrimination, and thereby denies a crucial conceptual distinction. It is the icon word of those committed to the race game. And they apply it with the same sort of mindless zeal as the inquisitors voiced 'heretic' or Senator McCarthy spat out 'Commie'.
 

The word 'black' has been perverted. Every non white is now, officially, 'black', be he Indian, Pakistani or Vietnamese. This gross and offensive dichotomy has an obvious purpose: the creation of an atmosphere of anti white solidarity. To suppress and distort the enormous variations within races which I every day observe by using language in this way is an outrage to all decent people whatever their skin colour. 
     
And there are other distortions: race riots are described by the politically motivated as 'uprisings', and by a Lord of Appeal as a 'superb and healthy catalyst for the British people' and the police blamed for the behaviour of violent thugs; rather like the patient blaming the doctor because he has a cold in the head.